I am not against principles or truths or topic based curriculum. However I do see a couple of inherent dangers in these types of approaches:

1) Bible stories are used improperly

I believe in the Bible. I believe it is the Word of God.

It contains not only the truth of God, but a vast narrative about the world He created, the broken people who inhabit it, and God’s redemptive work in making all things new.

So there is truth. There are principles, and topics are addressed in Scripture.

However, the temptation is to start from a principle-based or topic-centered standpoint and then go find a Bible story to support that principle or fit that topic.

I believe this approach to be backwards.

I think one needs to start with the Biblical narrative and allow the topics and principles, thus truth, to flow from it. I know it might be subtle, but I’ve heard all kinds of sermons about all kinds of things. One can easily make the story to fit the principle all the while doing great injustice to what the text is actually saying. I don’t think it’s necessarily “wrong”, but I think a Bible interpreter and expositor gets into less “trouble” when approaching the Biblical text first, then principles and topics second.

I can hear it now, though:

What if the principles were taken from the Biblical text?

Then I would say, start with the Bible story and walk your hearers through to discover that principle with them. Be careful with “traditional” principles that you have always heard quoted and supported with the Biblical text. It’s the Bible that is inspired, not a “principle.”

As children’s educators, the approach we take in Biblical interpretation models to students how to both read and apply Scripture. Therefore it is important “how” we approach teaching God’s Word.

2) Topics or principles are not always relevant to the hearer

Bible stories have been relevant and transcended millenia, while principles are often stuck in time. A Bible story might contain many principles. If one approaches teaching with just one principle, they run the risk that it won’t connect at the time. However, a biblical text has the power and ability to connect with a child, adolescent, and adult, all at the same time, albeit in different ways.

One caveat to starting with Scripture and ending with topics or principles:

It’s much more difficult to assess and apply.

Over the last nine years @ Hayward Wesleyan Main Street on Sunday mornings, we teach a chronological unfolding of the Biblical narrative and each time we let the story itself be applied to each student in the way they see fit. Each time we cycle through the stories things change. We offer different possibilities and seek to help them think through their own “current” story in light of “God’s” story. Thus the “Bible story” is always relevant, but it’s difficult to assess.

**This is my personal opinion. Feel free to let me know your thoughts in the comments below!

Published by Jeremy Mavis

Married to one. Father of two. Friend to several. Blogger to many. Pastor to all. And a passionate follower of Jesus Christ.

2 replies on “A Note about Principle and Topic-Based Curriculum”

  1. Thank you!! Very well said! I agree. That has been what I’ve run into with so many curriculums. When I study the narrative or scripture they chose to use to support a specified principle, I sometimes had a hard time understanding how they got to that point. For several years now we have been doing a walk through the Bible also. We’ve just taken the stories as they come and let the Lord direct us to the truths He has for us at that time. And I, like you, have seen the Lord give us one message from a passage or story at one time and when we’ve revisited that same passage, He’s got something new for us. God’s Word is ALIVE and ACTIVE! I try to teach my kids to “take off their old ears” that have heard the story before, and “put on their new ears” that want to hear what God has to say to them new and fresh today. Thanks for this post!

Comments are closed.